The expression of interest is here: https://backcountrybc.ca/document-category-layout/zincton-resort-proposal-may-2020/viewdocument

Concerns around this proposal are from a backcountry access point of view.

The resort proposal is stated to be an all-season resort. This would come under the All Seasons Resort Policy of the province which is administered by Mountain Resorts Branch. The proponent is asking for a "controlled recreation area" or CRA. The concern is that public access is restricted or denied unless a guest of Zincton resort. That means parking is restricted or no longer free. It means public access is restricted or no longer free. A concern arises in the expression of interest document in that the term "controlled recreation area" is never mentioned and the acronym CRA only appears once in the EOI and is never fully explained. This vagueness may be intentional because the potential loss of public parking and access is bound to be a sore point with backcountry users.

On page 7, the EOI states that the zoning of the Zincton lands by the Regional District of the Central Kootenay are Resource Area. The zoning permits public recreation. It was not adequately explained in the EOI how a controlled recreation area under the provincial all seasons resort policy coexists with or accommodates the zoning by the regional district. The concern is that public recreation access will be lost.

On page 8, the EOI states that the resort tenure overlaps with several commercial recreation tenures. Presumably, the existing commercial tenures do not exclude public recreation. The Zincton proposal should also not exclude public recreation.

On page 11, the EOI states that "Zincton represents the highest and best use of the subject Crown lands." This is subjective. In commercial real estate this assumption can lead to businesses paying tax rates that are not linked to a fair tax rate. In the case of Zincton, it is used to appeal to the province that public recreation is getting a free ride and that only the resort can provide a fair return on the Crown lands.

On page 12, the EOI lists four "active recreation lines (i.e. trails)" within the resort area. It states "Throughout development and operation, Zincton will ensure there is continued public access to these trails." This is too vague. The proponent must be more specific because access to the trails and trailheads may require passing through the controlled recreation area. The proponent must specifically commit to parking areas and defined backcountry access corridors that are open at all times (i.e. 24/7, 365 days a year). The backcountry access corridors, parking areas, number of vehicles accommodated etc. should be explicitly defined and shown on maps. There must be adequate signage indicating the corridors. Any waiver requirements must be explicitly stated and where free waivers are easily obtained. A template for free waivers, if required, could use the model that Cypress Resort uses in Cypress Provincial Park.